header-logo header-logo

Cuban missile crisis: five days to save the world

24 May 2024 / William Gibson
Issue: 8072 / Categories: Features , International , Military , Governance
printer mail-detail
174008
Secretive talks, tense negotiations & an ultimatum narrowly averted tragedy, writes William Gibson

On 21 October 1962, US President JF Kennedy sent an urgent message to UK Prime Minister Harold Macmillan to say the US had photographic evidence that Russia had installed surface-to-air missiles in Cuba and, even worse, that Soviet ships carrying more missiles were heading for the Communist island.

America had been very wary of possible threats from Cuba since the coup which had seized power for Fidel Castro, always assumed to have been achieved with Soviet backing.

According to Kennedy, he had only two options available to him: he could order an all-out air strike to take out the existing missile sites and then blockade Cuba; or he could impose an immediate no-entry zone around the island but with no air strike. Fortunately, the second option, favoured by Macmillan, was chosen and a 500-mile exclusion zone was established, patrolled by the US navy and air force.

As the Russian ships neared Cuba

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll