header-logo header-logo

Court on camera: filming in court now ‘the norm’

02 August 2023
Issue: 8036 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Media
printer mail-detail
Some 33 serious criminal cases have been filmed and broadcast since camera crews were first allowed into the crown courts one year ago.

Only the judge’s sentencing remarks can be filmed, so as to protect the privacy of victims, witnesses and jurors. Live broadcasts are aired with a short delay to account for reporting restrictions.

Parliament is now consulting on whether to expand filming to include Court of Appeal judges sitting in the crown court. The Ministry of Justice consultation, ‘Open justice: the way forward’, is open until 7 September.

Justice minister Mike Freer said the broadcasts ‘allowed the public to see justice being done in their courts and to understand the complex decisions judges make, building confidence in the justice system’.

John Battle, ITN’s head of legal, said filming ‘has swiftly become the norm’.

Issue: 8036 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Media
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll