header-logo header-logo

Committee to investigate sub judice debate

28 May 2025
Issue: 8118 / Categories: Legal News , Contempt , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
A parliamentary committee is investigating the sub judice resolution, which prevents MPs from referring to a current or impending court case

The House of Commons Procedure Committee will investigate, among other things, whether the current rule strikes the right balance, whether it should more closely align with the Contempt of Court Act 1981 (or vice versa), and whether current sanctions are sufficient.

It will also address the implications of social media on the resolution.

Cat Smith MP, chair of the Procedure Committee, said: ‘The time is right for an in-depth review.’

Submit evidence by 31 July 2025.

Issue: 8118 / Categories: Legal News , Contempt , Constitutional law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll