header-logo header-logo

11 June 2013
Issue: 7564 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Marketing
printer mail-detail

Co-op launches media ad campaign

 Modern market in legal services demands "transparency & flexibility"

Co-operative Legal Services (CLS), which is introducing “unbundling” for its family law services, has launched a major TV, radio and mass media advertising campaign.

The adverts play on the way many consumers feel baffled by legal jargon and intimidated by solicitors. They are to be broadcast on stations across London as well as nationally on Sky and satellite channels as part of a wider campaign that includes social media, press adverts and PR.

The Co-op has also launched a YouTube channel, The Practice, with 17 videos offering practical legal advice on issues such as divorce and separation.

The firm is also considering how to introduce “unbundling”—providing legal services on a partial retainer, where the client chooses which elements to purchase.

Christina Blacklaws, CLS director of policy, said: “In light of the impact of the civil legal aid changes, [the Co-op] is set to expand its current range of fixed and transparently-priced family law services to include an additional range of unbundled legal services.”

David Greene, NLJ consultant editor and partner at Edwin Coe, said: “There is nothing new in unbundling. A fancy name given to a way of delivering service to cash strapped clients that many solicitors have practised for years. In litigation, for instance, it is by no means uncommon that solicitors may allow the client to remain on the record but assist with pleadings, disclosure and trial preparation on set fees.

"We are likely to see much more of this with an increase in the small claims limit. Similarly fixed fees for certain stages of the litigation process are increasingly common. The modern market in legal services demands providers be transparent and flexible.”

Last month, the Law Society published a Practice Note on unbundling, noting that it can operate on different levels such as providing clients with self-help packs, providing discrete advice or checking documents.

In March, Yorkshire firm Oxley & Coward launched a “pay as you go” family law service. Clients take on some of the tasks normally undertaken by the solicitor, such as dealing with documents and administration, and only pay for advice when needed.
 

Issue: 7564 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Marketing
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll