header-logo header-logo

17 January 2019
Issue: 7824 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

CILEx plea for parity

The Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) is to prioritise campaigning for formal recognition that chartered legal executives operate on a par with solicitors, including removing blocks on judicial roles and post-Brexit professional recognition abroad.

It wants senior judicial roles opened up to chartered legal executives, who are currently unable to apply for judicial roles higher than District Judge. CILEx points out that this would help make the judiciary more representative of society as its members come from more diverse backgrounds than solicitors and barristers.

Phil Sherwood, president of CILEx, said: ‘Chartered legal executives and solicitors have been performing the same roles for decades, but their public standing, and many areas of our legal system, are yet to catch up with that reality.

‘Three quarters of our membership are women and we have far greater representation from ethnic minorities and state-school backgrounds than other parts of the profession.’

CILEx is calling for chartered legal executives to be recognised in the EU Lawyer Recognition Directive so they can offer services to other EU countries. Post-Brexit, it wants its legal executive members recognised alongside solicitors and barristers in any future trade agreement with the EU.

It will also campaign for an end to laws preventing chartered legal executives from providing certain services open to solicitors, for example, proving Power of Attorney by means of a certified copy.

Meanwhile, look out for Bevan Brittan paralegal apprentice Michelle Blackwell, who features in the government’s ‘Fire it up’ TV and social media campaign to highlight the breadth of apprenticeship opportunities. Blackwell currently works in the clinical negligence department and aims to eventually qualify as a solicitor.

Issue: 7824 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll