header-logo header-logo

28 May 2025
Issue: 8118 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Family , Public , Local authority
printer mail-detail

Children suffering as cases drag on

Families and children are waiting two years to have their cases resolved, a report by the National Audit Office (NAO) has found

The report, ‘Improving family court services for children’, published last week, considers both public and private family law proceedings involving children. It found the statutory time limit for public law cases of within 26 weeks has never been met nationally since it was introduced in 2014.

As of December 2024, more than 4,000 children were in proceedings lasting nearly two years or sometimes more. Delays breed delays as evidence and assessments need to be updated, and costs grow. For example, between 2018 and 2022, average spending on legal aid for a case brought by a local authority doubled, from about £6,000 to about £12,000, mainly due to cases taking longer. The NAO assessed this as representing an annual increase of £314m in legal aid spending for these cases.

There is regional variation—Wales performs best, with averages of 24 weeks for public cases and 18 weeks for private cases. London, on the other hand, averaged 53 weeks and 70 weeks, respectively.

However, complex accountability arrangements and limited information on the biggest causes of delays make it difficult to target improvements, the NAO found.

Nevertheless, the NAO noted the pathfinder pilot currently underway in five areas has yielded promising results to date.

Barbara Mills KC, chair of the Bar Council, urged the government to ‘spend to save’ by investing in pathfinder courts.

‘While local authority costs increased in the pilots, direct judicial costs halved,’ Mills said. She called for ‘a much more joined-up approach’ and highlighted that one party in four out of ten cases last year was unrepresented.

Law Society president Richard Atkinson said: ‘When cases are resolved quickly, fewer complexities develop and fewer court applications are needed, reducing overall costs to the taxpayer.’

Issue: 8118 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Family , Public , Local authority
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll