header-logo header-logo

27 January 2020
Issue: 7872 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Call for more public education on legal issues

The Law Society and Legal Services Board (LSB) have called for more public education on legal issues, after commissioning joint research

More than 28,000 people responded to an online survey by the two organisations, ‘Legal needs of individuals’, making it the largest ever survey of legal needs in England and Wales.

However, only 16% of respondents who had experienced a contentious legal issue perceived the issue as ‘legal’ in nature. This affected whether or not they sought legal advice. Those who did seek professional legal advice were more likely to feel they achieved a fair outcome than those who didn’t (66% compared to 53%).

LSB Chair Dr Helen Phillips said the survey ‘reveals a significant access to justice gap. For a variety of reasons people do not always seek legal advice. Many fail to identify the issues they face as being legal in nature. They perhaps class it as a housing issue or a financial problem or put it down to bad luck. This means they then don’t seek for the right kind of help’.

While 92% of respondents believed legal aid was a good thing, an astonishing 85% of those with a household income below the means test threshold did not think they would be eligible for legal aid.

Nine out of ten respondents were satisfied with the service they received from their solicitor, compared to 74% from unregulated providers. 84% felt their solicitor provided value for money. Only one in five respondents had shopped around when choosing a legal service.

Defective goods or services accounted for about one quarter of legal issues experienced by respondents, while 14% suffered anti-social behaviour by neighbours, 11% bought or sold property, 11% made or changed a will and 11% had employment issues.

Simon Davis, President of the Law Society, said the research ‘brings home the need to build better public understanding of legal issues and clear, accessible pathways to get professional legal advice’.

Issue: 7872 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll