header-logo header-logo

Businesses look to EU courts

25 July 2018
Issue: 7803 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Arbitration
printer mail-detail

Work & talent could pivot away from the UK legal services sector post-Brexit

Large businesses are abandoning English law in favour of EU courts for dispute resolution because of Brexit, research shows.

In a survey of 94 UK and international law firms and businesses by Thomson Reuters Legal, 35% said they have changed the jurisdiction in their dispute resolution clauses since the EU referendum. More than half of these have switched their dispute resolution clauses from a UK to an EU jurisdiction, with France and Germany the most popular choices.

Of those yet to make any changes to their contracts, two-fifths say they intend to review contracts if no significant progress is made in negotiations before March 2019 on a post-Brexit regime for the mutual recognition of court judgments.

However, there is a silver lining for English lawyers in the shape of arbitration. One in five of those yet to make a change are considering opting for arbitration rather than the courts in their contracts, and England is the most popular destination for this.

The report, The impact of Brexit on dispute resolution clauses, published this week, may heighten lawyers’ fears that Brexit could undermine London’s position as a global centre for dispute resolution.

Jim Leason, vice president of market development and strategy at Thomson Reuters, said: ‘The fact that a third of businesses are revising dispute resolution clauses away from the English courts should be a concern for the UK’s legal profession.

‘It is this initial selection in a contract that drives an entire industry of legal advice that supports transactional work, ongoing contract management and dispute resolution. If nothing concrete comes from Brexit negotiations soon or if there is a no-deal Brexit scenario, then more and more businesses will consider taking legal disputes elsewhere.

‘London has a long-standing reputation as a global legal centre. However, a poor outcome from Brexit could result in work and talent pivoting away from the UK legal services sector.’

In recent years, some EU countries have been stepping up their efforts to challenge London’s legal crown—projects to open English-speaking courts are currently underway in Brussels, Paris, Frankfurt and Amsterdam (see ‘EU lawyers court expansion’).

Issue: 7803 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Arbitration
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll