header-logo header-logo

07 June 2018
Issue: 7796 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

EU lawyers court expansion

English-speaking courts to be launched across Europe

The number of international English-speaking courts in the main European jurisdictions is likely to rise post-Brexit, with projects currently underway in Brussels, Paris, Frankfurt and Amsterdam.

The Netherlands Commercial Court, a specialist international court using the English language, is due to open this year. The German government announced plans last year to launch an English-speaking court in Frankfurt.

In February, the French government opened an English-speaking division of the Paris Court of Appeal, with the French justice minister Nicole Belloubet stating at the time that the London courts could be ‘replaced by other European jurisdictions’. Unlike its Belgian, German and Dutch counterparts, the Paris court can make decisions based on English law.

The Belgian government aims to open the Brussels International Business Court (BIBC) by 2020. It will hear cross-border commercial disputes and will be comprised of professional judges and lay judges, who will be selected by national and international legal experts and called on an ad hoc basis.

‘Following the national and international economic and political developments of the year 2017—including Brexit—the Belgian government sensed the need to create a specialised court capable of hearing cross-border commercial disputes,’ said Hakim Boularbah, partner, and Sarah Compagnion, associate, at Belgian firm Liedekerke Wolters Waelbroeck Kirkpatrick, in an interview with LexisNexis Legal Analysis last week.

‘The government observed that despite the role played by Brussels in the European and international scene as a host to many international and European institutions and companies, those wishing to appear before an English-speaking state court in Belgium, and not resort to arbitration, had no choice but to have their legal disputes decided abroad.’

There will be no appeal process, and disputes will be determined on the basis of Belgian private international law. Procedural rules will be based on the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration.

Issue: 7796 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll