header-logo header-logo

17 April 2008
Issue: 7317 / Categories: Legal News , Public
printer mail-detail

Action to be taken on Administrative Court delays

News

Justice minister Jack Straw will tackle delays in the listing and hearing of public law cases in the Administrative Court following a campaign by law and justice charity Public Law Project (PLP).

PLP sent a letter before claim to Straw last year, stating the delays were unlawful and in breach of the right to access to justice under Art 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights and the duty to ensure that there is an efficient and effective court system under s 1 of the Courts Act 2003.
Last week, the Administrative Court confirmed to PLP that more judges will be available for hearings, and some judges may be asked to sit during the summer vacation to deal with applications for the reconsideration of decisions under s 103A of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002.
Two more High Court judges are to sit in the court, and more deputy High Court judges will be recruited and trained in the summer.

PLP chair, Steve Cragg, says: “PLP has been very concerned about the lengthy delays in getting cases on in the court. 

“The position seems to have got worse over the last couple of years. We decided we needed to bring pressure to bear and if necessary take the matter to court to sort things out. PLP’s action seems to have played an important part in remedying the problem.”

Issue: 7317 / Categories: Legal News , Public
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll