header-logo header-logo

12 November 2010 / Jonathan Herring
Issue: 7441 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

20:10:2010

Jonathan Herring on the death knell of marriage

he twentieth of October 2010. Mark that date in your diary. It was beginning of the end for marriage. On that day the Supreme Court in Radmacher v Granatino [2010] UKSC 42 made a decisive step toward reducing marriage to a contract: marriage diminished to a private autonomous agreement between individuals.

I say a step towards reducing marriage to a contract because, of course, their lordships were not saying that pre-marriage agreements are now binding contracts. They made it clear that a court could make an ancillary relief order under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 that departed from a “pre-nup” where it would not be fair to hold the parties to the agreement. They gave examples when a pre-nup would not be fair: where it fails to provide for the needs of the children or for the needs of a spouse (paras 76, 77).

However, that should not disguise the fact the decision marks the contractualisation of marriage. In the future, in ancillary relief cases involving a pre-nup

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll