header-logo header-logo

b2

Professor Mark Engelman

Barrister
Professor Mark EngelmanIP Barrister, 4-5 Gray’s Inn. Affiliate Member of the Von Hugel Institute, St. Edmonds College Cambridge. Federation des Barreaux D’Europe IP Law Commission to the EUIPO



Barrister
Professor Mark EngelmanIP Barrister, 4-5 Gray’s Inn. Affiliate Member of the Von Hugel Institute, St. Edmonds College Cambridge. Federation des Barreaux D’Europe IP Law Commission to the EUIPO



ARTICLES BY THIS AUTHOR
Like the elephant in the famous parable, trade mark dilution isn’t easily determined, writes Mark Engelman
Mark Engelman on racism & publishers’ responsibilities
Mark Engelman outlines how the ‘Perfidious Albion’ of the government’s proposed intentions to breach an international treaty is nothing new
Show
8
Results
Results
8
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

London promotion underscores firm’s investment in white collar and investigations

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll