Jackson LJ’s proposal that a party should not be able to recover the cost of their After the Event (ATE) insurance premium has generated a lively debate. Like Marmite, either you love it or you hate it
Has Part 36 spawned its own cottage industry? Matthew Caton & Clare Arthurs report
Sports, education and charities practice welcomes senior associate
Partner and head of commercial litigation joins in Chelmsford
Firm strengthens Glasgow corporate practice with partner hire