header-logo header-logo

profile-sm_7

Mark Hill KC

Barrister

Mark Hill KC practises at Francis Taylor Building, Inner Temple and was a member of the legal team acting for the respondent in the Supreme Court. He is Honorary Professor at the Centre for Law and Religion at Cardiff University (Mark.Hill@ftb.eu.com)

Barrister

Mark Hill KC practises at Francis Taylor Building, Inner Temple and was a member of the legal team acting for the respondent in the Supreme Court. He is Honorary Professor at the Centre for Law and Religion at Cardiff University (Mark.Hill@ftb.eu.com)

ARTICLES BY THIS AUTHOR

What legal obligations are owed to the servants of God? Mark Hill QC discusses the judgment & impact of Preston

Mark Hill QC considers the “reasonable accommodation” of religious belief in UK law

Nothing succeeds like a success fee: not even an exaggerated claim or one funded by a non-party, says Mark Hill QC

Professor Mark Hill QC & Spencer Keen investigate a legal minefield

Show
8
Results
Results
8
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll