header-logo header-logo

david_corker_bw

David Corker

Partner

David Corker, partner, Corker Binning (dc@corkerbinning.comwww.corkerbinning.com)

Partner

David Corker, partner, Corker Binning (dc@corkerbinning.comwww.corkerbinning.com)

ARTICLES BY THIS AUTHOR
The fraud review & a starter for ten…David Corker provides Jonathan Fisher KC with some useful pointers

The authorities muster their forces to tackle ‘dirty money’. David Corker remains unimpressed

A year into post the Lord Chief Justice has drawn his battle lines, says David Corker

David Corker considers the implications of ditching dishonesty from the criminal cartel offence

Are warrants worth the paper they’re written on, asks David Corker

David Corker studies the events that led up to the SFO’s recent backtrack

Should the SFO rush in to prosecute banks over LIBOR, asks David Corker

Are the MoJ’s claims about DPAs more mythical than real, asks David Corker

Show
8
Results
Results
8
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll