THIS ISSUE

Issue: Vol 166, Issue 7689

04 March 2016

View other Issues

IN THIS ISSUE

Go to page of 3

AMD Environmental Ltd v Cumberland Construction Company Ltd [2016] EWHC 285 (TCC), [2016] All ER (D) 169 (Feb)

Khawar Qureshi QC reports on recent immunity decisions of the High Court

R (on the application of Immigration Law Practitioners Association) v Tribunal Procedure Committee and another [2016] EWHC 218 (Admin), [2016] All ER (D) 133 (Feb)

Ames and another v Davies and others [2016] EWHC 235 (QB), [2016] All ER (D) 189 (Feb)

Simon Duncan reports on class actions in the UK & LIBOR/FX claims

Legal profession welcomes ban on payment for controversial non-lawyers

Master of the Rolls delivers landmark judgment

Show

Results

Go to page of 3

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS

Read All

Conveyancers celebrate U-turn over mortgage handbook fee

Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook

Are you suited to a career in prosecution?

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors

LSB marks Mazur homework

Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)

NLJ this week: Stuck in the past?

The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness

NLJ this week: No automatic bar on ‘user damages’

A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law

Error message

Issue: Vol 166, Issue 7689

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison