header-logo header-logo

13 October 2023 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 8044 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Zander’s reflections: The accounts of the Inns of Court

142346
Michael Zander on why barristers have the legal right to ask to see the accounts

In 1965, 58 years ago, I wrote an article urging reform of the system requiring Bar students to eat dinners in the Inn as part of the qualifying process (The Lawyer, 1965, Vol.8, Nos 2&3, pp21-27. It was that little journal’s last issue). The article proposed ways in which the dining requirement could be turned into a meaningful educational experience. However, those proposals are not my topic here.

I acknowledged that what I was proposing would require some expenditure, and that I did not know whether the Inns could afford it because they did not publish their accounts. That remains the position today. Historical accounts can be accessed, but a barrister will only have access to his or her Inns’ modern-day accounts if they are members of the Inn’s Bench Finance Committee.

Shrouded in mystery

In 1854, the Royal Commission on the Inns of Court reported extensively on their

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll