header-logo header-logo

10 August 2021
Issue: 7945 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights , Criminal
printer mail-detail

XR protester conviction quashed

A third Extinction Rebellion protester has had her conviction overturned, following a Supreme Court ruling that obstruction of the highway is a valid protest

Amelia Halls was convicted in April for wilful obstruction of the public highway at the City of London Magistrates Court, after protesting in October 2019 on Hartmann Road, near London City Airport. She appealed on the basis Hartmann Road is a private road, no obstruction actually took place, she had an Arts 10 and 11 right to protest, and on the recent decision in DPP v Ziegler [2021] UKSC 23, , [2021] All ER (D) 70 (Jun).

The DPP did not contest the appeal, confirming they would withdraw in light of Ziegler as well as insufficient evidence. A judge at the Old Bailey quashed her conviction and suggested the Crown Prosecution Service consider whether other convictions are safe.

Hall’s solicitor, Adeela Khan, partner at Edward Fail Bradshaw & Waterson, said: ‘It was never in the public interest for the CPS to prosecute 1000s of Extinction Rebellion peaceful protesters.’

Issue: 7945 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll