header-logo header-logo

In the wrong

07 July 2011 / Mark Sefton , Oliver Radley-Gardner
Issue: 7473 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

One cannot rely upon one’s own wrong in the courtroom, observe Oliver Radley-Gardner & Mark Sefton

In the well known case of Interfoto Picture Library v. Stiletto [1989] QB 433, [1988] 1 All ER 348, Bingham LJ explained that, rather than developing an overriding general concept of good faith, the English law has adopted “piecemeal solutions to demonstrated problems of unfairness” without recourse to any more general concept. This article considers one of those solutions, namely the principle that a contracting party should not be permitted to rely upon his own wrong to take a benefit under his contract. This principle has been considered in a series of recent cases, frequently involving development agreements, contracts for the disposition of interests in land, and leases.

The New Zealand Shipping case

In New Zealand Shipping Co Ltd v Société des Ateliers et Chantiers de France [1919] AC 1, [1918-19] All ER Rep 552 the House of Lords was concerned with a contract by a French company, the vendors, to build a steamboat

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll