header-logo header-logo

06 June 2013 / Dominic Regan
Categories: Opinion , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

A work in progress

Dominic Regan offers an exclusive insight into the latest thoughts of Lord Justice Jackson…

The Rules Committee is to meet today (Friday 7 June). It is under government pressure on two fronts. Long signalled is an increase in the road traffic portal threshold from £10,000 to £25,000. This is not as big a deal as one might suspect. Not that many cases fall within this bracket. This I know for I have checked with two impeccable sources—a major road traffic insurer and the indefatigable John Spencer. Sir Rupert Jackson has also made the point to me that, the higher the value, the more likely it is that the defendant insurer would want to carefully scrutinise the claim and that is a luxury not permitted by the portal regime. An early admission is obligatory for otherwise the claim will exit and there is no coming back.

Of far greater significance, and at the crux of today’s agenda, is the implementation of new portals to catch injury claims, be they employers’ liability or otherwise. What is ground-breaking

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Megan Bradbury

Clarke Willmott—Megan Bradbury

Corporate team welcomes paralegal in Southampton

Howard Kennedy—Paul Moran

Howard Kennedy—Paul Moran

London firm strengthens real estate team with partner appointment

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll