header-logo header-logo

Wills claims triple

07 August 2014
Issue: 7618 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Disputes over wills have tripled in the past year, partly due to the rise of “DIY” executors and trustees.

There were 368 legal claims against executors in 2013, compared to 107 in the previous year, according to High Court figures. Claims included theft of assets, fraudulent distribution of assets and favouring certain beneficiaries above others.

Law firm Hugh James, which obtained the figures, said the use of family members as “DIY” executors was becoming more common but carried substantial problems. It said executors can be held responsible for errors made in the distribution of assets, can face legal claims from beneficiaries and can be forced to compensate the beneficiary out of their own pocket.

The increase in house prices means there is more at stake, increasing the temptation for dishonest executors. Lay executors have also been caught out purposely misinterpreting the will in order to favour a particular beneficiary.

Matthew Evans, partner at Hugh James, says: “Amateur executors may not want the money of the deceased to go outside of their immediate family and so take matters in their own hands distributing the assets as they see fit, even if that means they are acting contrary to their responsibilities as a legal executor.

“Ignorance of the law can be a stumbling block for lay executors. Mistakes can be made due to inexperience, such as delaying the sale of assets, which can cause a decline in value. In other cases, it’s not just ignorance of the law, but greed that is the problem.”

Issue: 7618 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll