header-logo header-logo

08 March 2012 / Michael Tringham
Issue: 7504 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Willing & able?

Michael Tringham reports on invalid, void & forged wills

Two Court of Appeal decisions in long-running disputes have averted one intestacy and confirmed another.

Martin Lavin’s 2004 death-bed will was first declared invalid and his six-figure estate intestate in 2009 by Mr Geoffrey Vos QC. At the 2011 retrial fresh evidence enabled Vos J (as he had by then become) to accept the will on the grounds that Anne, Martin’s sister and sole beneficiary, had held his shaking hand to steady it while he signed. Now that decision is overturned.

Explaining why Martin’s 2002 will is to be admitted to probate, Lord Justice Lewison said (Barrett v Bem [2012] EWCA Civ 52, [2012] All ER (D) 175 (Jan)): “The testator must make some…positive and discernible communication (verbal or non-verbal) that he wishes the will to be signed on his behalf by the third party…There is no finding here that Martin asked Anne to step in and sign the will; or that Anne asked Martin whether she should sign the will before she ‘stepped

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll