header-logo header-logo

19 August 2022
Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail

Will the ‘scale-up’ visa make a difference?

The Home Office is launching a ‘scale-up’ visa route next week to help businesses recruit highly skilled employees

The two-year visa, available from 22 August, is aimed at ‘scale-ups’―young, fast-growing, innovation-driven companies, as opposed to ‘start-ups’, which are recently established companies with potential to grow. To qualify, scale-ups should have a turnover or growth rate of more than 20% for the past three years and have at least ten employees at the start of the three-year period.

According to employment and immigration lawyer Gillian McKearney, senior associate, Fieldfisher, the individual will need to be sponsored for the first six months only and must be in a highly skilled role, earning at least £33,000 per year and at least £10.58 per hour.

Joanna Hunt, head of immigration at Fieldfisher, said: ‘With the headlines still dominated by stories of industry sectors struggling to source talent, the news of another launch of a new visa by the government would appear to offer some welcome relief.

‘However, the Scale Up visa is unlikely to have a major impact on companies facing recruitment challenges, particularly those who need to recruit low skilled workers.’

Hunt said the application process would be ‘less onerous’ than other sponsor licence applications but was still ‘a time and cost commitment which inhibits how responsive an employer can be when they have a new candidate they want to hire.

‘The other big issue with the scale up visa is that it will allow a visa holder to become “unsponsored” within six months, meaning they can freely move to any other employer. This will potentially attract applicants who want that freedom but is unlikely to be popular with employers who may lose workers they have invested time and money to onboard.

‘It is also likely to mean a greater use of clawback clauses in employment contracts by employers to try and recoup visa costs from workers who leave a business early to try and incentivise them to stay. But the increased use of clawbacks is controversial as it could lead to workers being exploited by underhand employers.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll