header-logo header-logo

04 September 2008
Issue: 7335 / Categories: Legal News , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Will disputes on the rise

Wills and probate

Claims by people seeking to challenge wills and trusts have soared over the past four years as the value of estates has increased and could lead to a rise in negligence claims against trustees, according to experts.

Fay Copeland, head of Wedlake Bell’s contentious trusts and probate team, says her firm has seen the number of claims over wills and trusts treble since 2004.

“As personal wealth has swelled in value in recent years, thanks to escalating house prices, bumper bonus payments and the strength of other long-term investment returns, the assets left in wills and trusts have become all the more worth fighting for,” she says.

She says the rising divorce rate has created more complex family structures, clouding the issue of who should get what.

In addition to the booming trade in claims, Copeland says that increases in the number of people disputing trustees’ oversight of the investment management of the trust’s portfolio are likely. Trustees themselves can also be held personally liable if they have not taken and reviewed professional investment advice, despite not being required to hold professional qualifications.

“With trusts now a widely used tax mitigation and inheritance planning tool, increased asset price volatility is likely to drive growing numbers of claims for negligence if trustees have failed to meet their responsibilities to ensure that investments are appropriately managed,” she says.

Issue: 7335 / Categories: Legal News , Wills & Probate
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll