header-logo header-logo

Wide of the mark?

17 February 2017 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7734 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail
nlj_7734_samuels

Is there a judge’s jurisdictional problem, asks Alec Samuels

Lawyers tend to think in terms of civil or family or criminal. New QCs are classified in this way. The High Court is divided into Queen’s Bench, Family and Chancery, though subdivisions appear such as Admiralty, Commercial, Technology and Construction, and Planning in the Queen’s Bench, Court of Protection in Family, and Companies and Bankruptcy and Patents in Chancery. Public law and human rights law come largely by way of judicial review through the Administrative Court. Increasingly today the practitioner tends to specialise more and more in an ever-narrowing area of work, particularly the barrister but also, albeit to a lesser extent, the solicitor. The practitioner responds to the demands and opportunities of the market. Legal life seems to be getting ever more complicated—and specialised.

Diverse work

Now it is most unlikely that the judge can remain anything like so specialised. The circuit or county court judge may be largely civil or largely criminal, but usually he may be called upon to handle almost any case.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll