header-logo header-logo

Why Pre-action Protocol Number 13 is bad news for creditors

23 February 2018
Issue: 7782 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail
nlj_7782_thompson

Pre-action Protocol Number 13 ‘must be the biggest turn-off for creditors since the Grayling hike in court fees’, Peter Thompson QC, general editor, Civil Court Practice (The Green Book), writes in this week’s NLJ.

Thompson says the protocol adds to the administrative burden for creditors, creating extra hurdles before they can go to court, and could act as a deterrent to some, Thompson says. For example, it requires creditors to produce an extra 10 pages of documents including an information sheet, response form and statement of income and expenditure, and builds an extra 30 days response time.

Issue: 7782 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll