header-logo header-logo

18 July 2025 / John Martin
Issue: 8125 / Categories: Features , Profession , Expert Witness , Property , Landlord&tenant
printer mail-detail

Whose land is it anyway?

225828
Agricultural archives are a valuable (but neglected) resource for resolving access rights, writes Professor John Martin
  • Resolving land access disputes often hinges on overlooked historical records, such as the National Farm Survey and War Agricultural Executive Committee files.
  • Second world war-era surveys and committee documents offer detailed insights into land use, ownership and farm conditions, with many now accessible via the National Archives.

Investigating access disputes, together with a multitude of other rights and obligations regarding agricultural land, can be problematic, given the paucity of verifiable archival material that appears to be available. This is often compounded by the prevalence of what are often rather vague and contradictory ingrained verbal recollections. For those faced with the challenge of investigating agricultural disputes, a number of often largely neglected documentary sources can be accessed. These include the National Farm Survey 1941–43 and the records of the War Agricultural Committees, which directed the food production campaign in the second world war. There are also a wide range of relevant

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll