header-logo header-logo

Whose land is it anyway?

18 July 2025 / John Martin
Issue: 8125 / Categories: Features , Profession , Expert Witness , Property , Landlord&tenant
printer mail-detail
225828
Agricultural archives are a valuable (but neglected) resource for resolving access rights, writes Professor John Martin
  • Resolving land access disputes often hinges on overlooked historical records, such as the National Farm Survey and War Agricultural Executive Committee files.
  • Second world war-era surveys and committee documents offer detailed insights into land use, ownership and farm conditions, with many now accessible via the National Archives.

Investigating access disputes, together with a multitude of other rights and obligations regarding agricultural land, can be problematic, given the paucity of verifiable archival material that appears to be available. This is often compounded by the prevalence of what are often rather vague and contradictory ingrained verbal recollections. For those faced with the challenge of investigating agricultural disputes, a number of often largely neglected documentary sources can be accessed. These include the National Farm Survey 1941–43 and the records of the War Agricultural Committees, which directed the food production campaign in the second world war. There are also a wide range of relevant papers

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll