header-logo header-logo

Whose diary is it anyway?

27 July 2017 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7756 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

Are the contents of a minister’s diary disclosable under the Freedom of Information Act? Nicholas Dobson reports

  • A ministerial diary was found on balance to be disclosable under FOIA.

On 24 May 2017 a notable piece was added to the grand jigsaw of English legal history. For it was then that the Court of Appeal agreed that a ministerial diary in the Department of Health (DOH) should be disclosed.

This followed a request under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA 2000) by a journalist (Simon Lewis) for disclosure of the diary of Andrew Lansley (former Conservative health secretary) from 12 May 2010 to 30 April 2011. As The Daily Telegraph reported: ‘Transparency campaigners say the case is of importance because the diary covers the time Mr Lansley was working on the Health and Social Care Act and allegedly subjected to extensive lobbying by private healthcare interests.’

The issue has certainly been through the legal wringer. For, after DOH had initially disclosed a redacted version of the diary, the Information Commissioner (IC) required

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

London promotion underscores firm’s investment in white collar and investigations

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll