header-logo header-logo

04 November 2022 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 8001 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Whoops…as the judge said

99698
Dominic Regan reveals judicial slips, trips, defiance & high kicks

The law reports are bursting with tales of momentary ineptitude which result in litigation. Nobody is perfect and those who get involved in determining disputes can themselves be guilty of the occasional lapse.

Mishaps in court

One issue that went all the way up to the then House of Lords in Majrowski v Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Trust [2006] UKHL 34, [2006] 4 All ER 395 was whether an employer could be vicariously liable under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997. It was only in the course of oral argument before the highest court in the land that Lord Hope gently pointed out that the answer ‘overlooked by everybody’ (at para [44]) was to be found by reading the Act which was incidentally a model of brevity, running to just 16 sections.

Last year, three members of the Court of Appeal delivered a joint judgment in Global Energy Horizons Corporation v Gray [2021] EWCA Civ 123. At para [8], the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll