header-logo header-logo

26 January 2026
Issue: 8147 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Who’s on the 2026 silk list?

The rank of King’s Counsel (KC) has been awarded to 96 barristers, and no solicitors, in the latest silk round

They comprise 67 male (28% success rate) and 29 female (34% success rate) barristers, 11 barristers who declared an ethnic origin other than white, and four barristers who declared a disability.

A total of 325 lawyers applied, giving a 29.5% success rate.

However, Law Society president Mark Evans described the lack of solicitors on the list as ‘extremely’ disappointing. Solicitors with higher rights of audience have been eligible to apply for silk since 1995.

Evans said: ‘Since 1995, only 66 solicitors have been appointed out of approximately 231 that have applied.

‘Solicitors bring invaluable skills and experience to the sector. There need be no limits to their ambition, including being appointed silks. While the number of solicitors applying for KC status reflects the historic division of advocacy work between the Bar and solicitors, the proportion of successful solicitor appointments—particularly from diverse backgrounds—must increase.

‘The Law Society supports a robust, merit-based application process that values a range of experiences. We are keen to help eligible solicitors demonstrate their unique skills and experience and are calling for their recognition as part of the qualifying process.’

Bar chair Kirsty Brimelow KC said: ‘I send my warmest congratulations to all those receiving news of their successful silk application today.

'It is truly a mark of excellence in advocacy and KCs are recognised internationally as experts and leaders in their field. I also offer commiserations to those who were unsuccessful this year. I wasn’t successful on my first occasion of application. I do hope you will try again in future.’

Brimelow said the Bar Council will continue to investigate ‘barriers to appointment, including at the employed Bar, and we’re keen to support further improvements to the processes for applying, including the quality of information available to applicants, to ensure members can make the most excellent applications and increase their chances of success’.

A further three solicitors, four legal academics and a circuit judge are to be appointed Honorary King’s Counsel (KC Honoris Causa), recognising their positive impact on the law or the legal profession outside the courtroom. They include Peter Kandler, who co-founded the UK’s first law centre in Kensington in 1970, ADR and consumer rights specialist Dean Dunham, and Professor Susan Edwards of Northumbria University, whose work on domestic violence and gender-based violence has helped shape legislation and prosecutorial practice in this area.

The others are: Colin Passmore, former Simmons & Simmons senior partner and legal privilege specialist; Judge Emma Nott, whose research has helped drive fairness and equality at the Bar; Professor Eirik Bjorge, of Bristol University, a human rights and European law specialist; Professor Rosie Harding, a specialist in disability and mental capacity law; and Professor James C Hathaway, Michigan University, a refugee law specialist.

The award ceremony will take place in March at Westminster Hall, London.

Issue: 8147 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll