header-logo header-logo

25 June 2021 / John Bowers KC
Issue: 7938 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Whistleblowing: eyes on the prize?

51885
Is it time for the UK to consider financial rewards for whistleblowers? John Bowers QC weighs up the pros & cons
  • Offering monetary rewards to those who blow the whistle, as in the US, has thus far had a lukewarm reception in the UK, with concerns surrounding motivations and increased antagonism.
  • However, it is clearly desirable—both morally and economically—to encourage whistleblowers to come forward, and the possibility of reward may provide more of a reason to do so.

Bradley C Birkenfeld, a former banker at UBS, served two and a half years in prison for conspiring with a wealthy California developer to evade United States income taxes. He was convicted of fraud for withholding crucial information from federal investigators, including details of his top client, the property developer Igor Olenicoff.

Yet, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) made Birkenfeld’s post-prison life just a little bit easier by granting him in 2012 a reward of $104m for whistleblowing—not for blowing the whistle on his own activities, but by divulging the schemes

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll