header-logo header-logo

Whistleblowing: eyes on the prize?

25 June 2021 / John Bowers KC
Issue: 7938 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail
51885
Is it time for the UK to consider financial rewards for whistleblowers? John Bowers QC weighs up the pros & cons
  • Offering monetary rewards to those who blow the whistle, as in the US, has thus far had a lukewarm reception in the UK, with concerns surrounding motivations and increased antagonism.
  • However, it is clearly desirable—both morally and economically—to encourage whistleblowers to come forward, and the possibility of reward may provide more of a reason to do so.

Bradley C Birkenfeld, a former banker at UBS, served two and a half years in prison for conspiring with a wealthy California developer to evade United States income taxes. He was convicted of fraud for withholding crucial information from federal investigators, including details of his top client, the property developer Igor Olenicoff.

Yet, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) made Birkenfeld’s post-prison life just a little bit easier by granting him in 2012 a reward of $104m for whistleblowing—not for blowing the whistle on his own activities, but by divulging the schemes

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll