header-logo header-logo

15 November 2012
Issue: 7538 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Whiplash truth & lies

Many whiplash sufferers do not claim compensation

Nearly 40% of whiplash sufferers do not claim compensation, according to a report by the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL).

Of 4,000 people surveyed by APIL, one per cent (51 people) had suffered a whiplash injury in the past year, and 522 people had suffered whiplash at some point in their life.

Of those 522 people, only 321 (more than 60%) had made a claim for their injury.

According to APIL, whiplash claims have fallen by 24,000 in the last year. It says one in five sufferers have symptoms for more than one year, 30% of claims are encouraged by insurers, and 90% of sufferers are diagnosed by a medical professional.

APIL is calling for “free and prompt exchange of information” between the RTA claims portal and the Insurance Fraud Bureau to help identify fraudulent activity at the earliest opportunity, and for whiplash claimants or their solicitors to sign a “statement of truth” and be prosecuted for fraud if they breach it.

It also wants insurers banned from making offers of compensation before a medical report has been seen, and “robust enforcement” of the imminent ban on the sale of claimants’ personal details by the defendant’s insurers.

Launching the paper, The Whiplash Report 2012, at the House of Commons last week, APIL president Karl Tonks told MPs: “The people who suffer these injuries are genuine.”

Issue: 7538 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll