header-logo header-logo

02 March 2021
Issue: 7923 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Whiplash reform date set

Lawyers have called for higher compensation levels after ministers confirmed the whiplash reforms will be implemented on 31 May.

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) laid draft statutory instruments last week showing the proposed fixed tariff compensation levels for soft tissue injuries in road traffic accident (RTA) claims, and requiring medical evidence before an offer to settle can be made. The small claims track limit will be raised from £1,000 to £5,000.

The tariffs are set on a sliding scale according to duration of injury, from £240 for three months or less to £1,320 for nine months to a year, £3,005 for 15-18 months and £4,215 for 18-24 months.

A further £20-£130 is added for minor psychological injuries, depending on duration of injury.

The Law Society’s head of justice, Richard Miller, said: ‘As expected, the compensation tariffs for whiplash have been set far lower than the Judicial College Guidelines currently allow. 

‘Solicitors and other key stakeholders urgently need more detail on how the portal will work in practice so they can prepare for the changes. For example, more information is needed on how easy to use the court process will be for claimants if the insurer denies liability or if they want to challenge their level of compensation.’

Qamar Anwar, managing director, First4Lawyers, said it was encouraging that non-RTA claims will remain at £1,000, and the small claims limit for children and protected parties has been removed entirely. However, ‘the fundamental aspect of expecting the average consumer to represent themselves as a litigant in person remains unchanged, leaving vulnerable injured people to navigate a legal system they have no experience of or expertise in’.

Ian Davies, who leads the motor team at Kennedys, said the changes were ‘seismic’ and the market was ‘set for a frantic three months of development to ensure systems are in place’. 

An MoJ spokesperson said: ‘Our reforms will save motorists money by limiting fraud and reducing excessive costs while simplifying the process for making claims.

‘The new online system provides a modern, user-friendly service along with guidance and a telephone helpline to support unrepresented claimants at every step.’
Issue: 7923 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll