What now for lawful act economic duress?

24 September 2021 / Michael Frisby , Alasdair McDowell

Issue: 7949 / Categories: Features , Commercial

Michael Frisby & Alasdair McDowell look at future possibilities for this controversial doctrine

Considers a recent lawful act economic duress case, Pakistan International Airline Corporation v Times Travel (UK) Ltd.

In Pakistan International Airline Corporation v Times Travel (UK) Ltd [2021] UKSC 40, [2021] All ER (D) 40 (Aug) the Supreme Court declined to expand the scope of the controversial doctrine of lawful act economic duress so as to allow the claimant to prevail.

However, in judgments written by Lords Hodge and Burrows, the court both affirmed the doctrine’s existence, and addressed the possibility of future development of this area of law.

The case

Times Travel (UK) Limited (Times Travel) is a travel agent. During the relevant period, Times Travel’s business consisted almost entirely of selling airline tickets from the UK to Pakistan. Pakistan International Airline Corporation (the Airline) was the only operator of direct flights from the UK to Pakistan at that time.

The parties entered into an agreement under which Times Travel

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

What now for lawful act economic duress?

Michael Frisby & Alasdair McDowell look at future possibilities for this controversial doctrine

Considers a recent lawful act economic duress case, Pakistan International Airline Corporation v Times Travel (UK) Ltd.

However, in judgments written by Lords Hodge and Burrows, the court both affirmed the doctrine’s existence, and addressed the possibility of future development of this area of law.

The case

The parties entered into an agreement under which Times Travel

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS

Read All

NLJ this week: Motor commissions & fiduciary duties

The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings

NLJ this week: The power of Interpol red notices

Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ

NLJ this week: Approach with caution post-Mazur

Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?

Philip Sales is selected as next Deputy President

Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year

Tax shock ahead for partners?

Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget

Error message

What now for lawful act economic duress?

The case

The case

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington