What future for judicial review?

• Can the virtual unanimity against the need for legislative reform of judicial review succeed in affecting the government’s plans?

The news in the Queen’s Speech that the legislative programme would include a Judicial Review Reform Bill came only days after the close of the government’s six-week consultation on the report of the Independent Review of Administrative Law (IRAL), chaired by Lord Faulks. Though the subject is one that obviously deserves mature and careful thought, the signs are that the government plans to rush ahead.

Every aspect of this process has been rushed. There was widespread complaint that the timeframe for IRAL was inadequate. The Constitutional and Administrative Law Bar Association (ALBA) is bringing judicial review proceedings to establish that the consultation on the IRAL’s report was unlawful in not affording adequate time for consideration and response.

IRAL was plainly Boris Johnson’s response to defeat in the Supreme Court in the two Miller cases, especially