header-logo header-logo

20 September 2016
Issue: 7715 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

What drives lateral hires?

Culture rather than compensation entices City partners away from their firms, new research has shown.

A mere 15% of partners who switched firms were motivated by money, according to an online survey by legal search firm Major, Lindsey & Africa (MLA). Instead, more than three out of five said culture was the strongest factor attracting them to their new firm.

MLA’s inaugural London Lateral Partner Survey is based on the responses of 176 City law firm partners who changed firm in the past five years. Of those who selected culture as their reason for moving, two-thirds said diversity and inclusion played an important role in their decision. This was especially true for women—61% selected diversity as a key driver, compared to 21% of men.

Brent Harris, executive director, international operations of MLA, says: “Law firms should take note that prospective laterals are swayed more by leadership opportunities and cultural incentives than financial gain.” 

The key reasons given for leaving a firm were poor leadership and management.

Nearly 60% of lateral hires resulted in either new clients or the transfer of some of the new partner’s existing clients, and one third resulted in an increase in both.

Issue: 7715 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll