header-logo header-logo

Ward of court

19 September 2014 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7622 / Categories: Features , In Court
printer mail-detail
backpage_0_0

Dominic Regan pays tribute to the wit & judgment of Sir Alan Ward

“This case involves a number of—and here I must not fall into Dr Spooner’s error—warring bankers.” Only Lord Justice Ward could get away with this mischievous comment. Recently retired from the Court of Appeal, he was what can only be called a character. He produced a string of exotic judgments but also maintained a sense of pragmatism. Many a decision was founded upon commonsense.

His opening paragraph in Sutton v Hutchinson [2005] EWCA Civ 1773, [2005] All ER (D) 127 (Nov) is a gem. “The appellant is a lap dancer. I would not, of course, begin to know exactly what that involves. One can guess at it, but could not faithfully describe it. The judge tantalizingly tells us…that the purpose is to tease but not to satisfy.” Since his wife, Helen Ward, is the pre-eminent divorce lawyer it is just as well that Sir Alan is in the dark.

Star Ward

While many on the bench understandably struggle with the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
The threat of section 21 ‘no fault’ eviction was banished this week, after the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 passed into law
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
back-to-top-scroll