header-logo header-logo

Waging war

07 June 2012 / Hle Blog
Issue: 7517 / Categories: Blogs
printer mail-detail

HLE blogger Sophie Earnshaw bemoans the abolition of the current minimum wage for trainee solicitors

"On 17 May 2012 the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) announced their decision to abolish the current minimum wage for trainee solicitors. From 1 August 2014, law firms will be able to pay trainee solicitors the national minimum hourly rate of £6.08. These changes to remuneration will cause additional barriers to access a career in law and will have a negative impact on the legal profession with a less diverse and equal workforce. It will essentially result in a damaging step back in an area that has traditionally been a popular career choice for the middle class. Despite growing opportunities and encouragement for people of all backgrounds to enter law, to a certain extent it continues to be an area of work for those from privilege largely due to the prestige, expense and deep seated networks that remain embedded in the profession.

Deciding to pursue a career in law should not be under-estimated. It is a significant investment of money and time, particularly for those who self-fund and study part-time. Not only is there the expense of studying a law degree or conversion, the fees for the legal practice course or the Bar professional training course are high. On completing studies, the average student will be leaving with a mountain of debt. Acquiring a training contract is no simple feat and some enter into low paid, and even unpaid, positions as paralegals, legal support and interns to get their foot in the door. To survive on this salary when the cost of living is continually rising, is barely achievable in the short-term let alone sustainable long-term, unless they are lucky enough to have financial backing from family to support them through their career.

The SRA states that during the decision-making process they had given ‘full consideration to the potential diversity issues highlighted by the consultation and equality impact assessment, but concluded that setting a minimum salary was not the best way to address these’. This is highly questionable. By removing the set minimum salary for trainees, they will be preventing people from lower socio-economic backgrounds pursuing a career in law…”

To continue reading go to: www.halsburyslawexchange.co.uk

Issue: 7517 / Categories: Blogs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

London promotion underscores firm’s investment in white collar and investigations

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll