header-logo header-logo

07 June 2012 / Hle Blog
Issue: 7517 / Categories: Blogs
printer mail-detail

Waging war

HLE blogger Sophie Earnshaw bemoans the abolition of the current minimum wage for trainee solicitors

"On 17 May 2012 the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) announced their decision to abolish the current minimum wage for trainee solicitors. From 1 August 2014, law firms will be able to pay trainee solicitors the national minimum hourly rate of £6.08. These changes to remuneration will cause additional barriers to access a career in law and will have a negative impact on the legal profession with a less diverse and equal workforce. It will essentially result in a damaging step back in an area that has traditionally been a popular career choice for the middle class. Despite growing opportunities and encouragement for people of all backgrounds to enter law, to a certain extent it continues to be an area of work for those from privilege largely due to the prestige, expense and deep seated networks that remain embedded in the profession.

Deciding to pursue a career in law should not be under-estimated. It is a significant investment of money and time, particularly for those who self-fund and study part-time. Not only is there the expense of studying a law degree or conversion, the fees for the legal practice course or the Bar professional training course are high. On completing studies, the average student will be leaving with a mountain of debt. Acquiring a training contract is no simple feat and some enter into low paid, and even unpaid, positions as paralegals, legal support and interns to get their foot in the door. To survive on this salary when the cost of living is continually rising, is barely achievable in the short-term let alone sustainable long-term, unless they are lucky enough to have financial backing from family to support them through their career.

The SRA states that during the decision-making process they had given ‘full consideration to the potential diversity issues highlighted by the consultation and equality impact assessment, but concluded that setting a minimum salary was not the best way to address these’. This is highly questionable. By removing the set minimum salary for trainees, they will be preventing people from lower socio-economic backgrounds pursuing a career in law…”

To continue reading go to: www.halsburyslawexchange.co.uk

Issue: 7517 / Categories: Blogs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll