header-logo header-logo

Voyage of recovery

16 January 2020 / Matthew Hoe
Issue: 7870 / Categories: Features , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail
14098
Matthew Hoe provides an update on disbursements in fixed costs cases
  • Counsel fees: a disbursement?
  • Scope: directly addressing fix costs.
  • Comment: hard negotiations.

Practitioners on both sides in fixed costs personal injury claims will mark the Court of Appeal’s judgment in Cham v Aldred [2019] EWCA Civ 1780, [2019] All ER (D) 160 (Oct) which settles important points about what can be recovered as a disbursement in such claims. While no doubt it will bite mostly on claimants’ costs, it applies also to defendants’ costs under CPR 45, s IIIA of the fixed costs regime. Underpinning the case was a dispute about whether fixed costs cover only the solicitor’s work, or all legal representatives’ work on the case, or indeed any and all work that is required by the claim.

Counsel fees

The appeal concerned counsel’s fees. The claimant was a child. His claim started under the RTA Protocol but exited because of a liability dispute between the drivers. The claimant’s damages were agreed in principle but approval was needed.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll