header-logo header-logo

16 January 2020 / Matthew Hoe
Issue: 7870 / Categories: Features , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail

Voyage of recovery

14098
Matthew Hoe provides an update on disbursements in fixed costs cases
  • Counsel fees: a disbursement?
  • Scope: directly addressing fix costs.
  • Comment: hard negotiations.

Practitioners on both sides in fixed costs personal injury claims will mark the Court of Appeal’s judgment in Cham v Aldred [2019] EWCA Civ 1780, [2019] All ER (D) 160 (Oct) which settles important points about what can be recovered as a disbursement in such claims. While no doubt it will bite mostly on claimants’ costs, it applies also to defendants’ costs under CPR 45, s IIIA of the fixed costs regime. Underpinning the case was a dispute about whether fixed costs cover only the solicitor’s work, or all legal representatives’ work on the case, or indeed any and all work that is required by the claim.

Counsel fees

The appeal concerned counsel’s fees. The claimant was a child. His claim started under the RTA Protocol but exited because of a liability dispute between the drivers. The claimant’s damages were agreed in principle but approval was needed.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Megan Bradbury

Clarke Willmott—Megan Bradbury

Corporate team welcomes paralegal in Southampton

Howard Kennedy—Paul Moran

Howard Kennedy—Paul Moran

London firm strengthens real estate team with partner appointment

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll