header-logo header-logo

20 December 2018
Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail

Visa shake-up after Brexit

Employment law solicitors have given a mixed reaction to Home Secretary Sajid Javid’s white paper on post-Brexit migration

The white paper, laid in Parliament this week, would let low-skilled migrants work in the UK for one year, sets a controversial £30,000 minimum salary for five-year skilled visas—many skilled professionals including nurses earn less than that—and abolishes both the cap on highly skilled migrants and the resident labour market test which requires employers to advertise jobs for four weeks. EU nationals would not require visas.

Julia Jackson, partner at Wedlake Bell, said: ‘This will both ease the bureaucratic burden on employers and speed up the recruitment process.

‘More broadly it's difficult to see how the Home Office will achieve its twin aims of creating a "business friendly" system minimising the burden on employers while recovering the costs of running the immigration system from those who use it. 

‘The White Paper specifies that employers will pay an immigration skills charge (currently £1,000 per worker per year for large companies reduced to £364 per worker per year for SMEs). In addition overseas nationals will continue to pay the immigration health surcharge (currently £200 per person per year but due to double this month). On top of this are visa fees and the cost of the sponsor licence itself.  For employers who have not yet engaged with the sponsor licence regime the additional costs are likely to be an unwelcome shock.’

Claire Nilson, Counsel at Faegre Baker Daniels, said: ‘The aim seems to be to bring EU nationals seeking to work in the UK post-Brexit in line with non-EU nationals in the same situation.

‘A short term visa option will be available, with fewer restrictions, for all applicants from low risk countries irrespective of their skill level. However, this will come with a one-year cooling off period so that, after the visa expires, the individual is unable to apply to return to the UK during that time period.

‘The short term route would not permit either family members to join the visa applicant in the UK or provide a path for permanent settlement.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Megan Bradbury

Clarke Willmott—Megan Bradbury

Corporate team welcomes paralegal inSouthampton

Howard Kennedy—Paul Moran

Howard Kennedy—Paul Moran

London firm strengthens real estate team with partner appointment

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll