header-logo header-logo

17 October 2009 / Julian Samiloff
Issue: 7282 / Categories: Features , EU , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Violations abroad

Strasbourg is likely to play a major role in the development of global human rights law, says Julian Samiloff

In Al-Skeini v Secretary of State for Defence [2007] UKHL 26, [2007] All ER (D) 106 (Jun) the House of Lords ruled that Iraqi civilians arrested and detained by British soldiers had the protection of the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998) and consequently the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention). The appeal may be divided into two parts. The first part concerned the cases of Iraqis killed as a result of British action in the streets of Basra, while the second arose out of the treatment of Baha Mousa—an Iraqi who was beaten to death while being detained at a British military base in Basra.

For the government it was argued that that because UK forces did not have full control of Iraq, Iraq could not be thought of as being within UK jurisdiction for the purposes of HRA 1998 and therefore the writ of the Convention could not run in Iraq. The law

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll