header-logo header-logo

12 January 2023
Issue: 8008 / Categories: Legal News , International , EU , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Views wanted on Hague 2019—recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments

Ministers have launched a consultation relating to the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments—a key issue for lawyers since Brexit.

The government is seeking input from practitioners with experience of current cross-border litigation, and is especially keen to hear from legal professionals, academics and individuals with an interest in private international law.

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) consultation seeks views on whether the UK should sign and ratify the Hague Convention of 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters (Hague 2019).

The Convention establishes common rules to facilitate recognition and enforcement between contracting states. It currently has seven signatories, while two parties—the EU and Ukraine—have ratified it.

Since the end of the transition period on 31 December 2020, there has been no comprehensive multilateral private international law framework in place between the UK and EU, therefore relations have been based on the Hague Convention from 2005. The consultation notes that, if the UK ratifies Hague 2019 but later accedes to the Lugano Convention, the Lugano Convention rules would supersede Hague 2019 to provide rules and a framework between the UK, EU and EFTA states.

The consultation, which closes on 9 February 2023, can be viewed here.

A paper summarising the responses will be published on gov.uk in spring 2023.

Issue: 8008 / Categories: Legal News , International , EU , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll