header-logo header-logo

16 December 2016
Issue: 7728 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-detail

Vidisha Joshi—Hodge Jones & Allen

vidisha_joshi

Firm appoints new managing partner

 

Pioneering London law firm, Hodge Jones & Allen has appointed 38-year-old Vidisha Joshi to be its new managing partner, making her one of the youngest lawyers in the country to run a major firm.

Senior partner Patrick Allen, will hand over the role on 3 January 2017, having been in the job for the last 40 years since opening the firm. He will retain his role as senior partner and chair of the firm’s management board.

It has been a meteoric rise for personal injury solicitor Vidisha Joshi. She joined the firm in 2012 to implement a new case management system across the firm, which she delivered in just six months, a year ahead of schedule.

A year later she was promoted to associate and after a further 12 months later to partner. In 2015, she was promoted a third time to head the firm’s largest department—personal injury—also joining the firm’s board as an equity partner.

Vidisha will carry on leading the firm’s PI team and acting for clients, particularly in relation to accidents in public places. Current cases include acting on behalf of the husband of a woman who was killed in Knightsbridge by a falling tree during Hurricane Gonzalo.  

Vidisha says: “It’s been a real journey in a short space of time. I joined Hodge Jones & Allen because I fully believed in the firm’s ethos. We have a rich heritage of fighting for justice and I am passionate about becoming one of the guardians of that legacy. I am excited about steering our brilliant people through the firm’s next evolution.

“Undoubtedly, the firm’s partnership will continue to face challenges but we have successfully adapted to survive fundamental changes over the last two decades including the loss of most legal aid and the LASPO reforms. We have coped with intensifying competition and regulatory and funding changes and are stronger for it. Our highly analytical approach gives us insight into how our business runs and with it comes the ability to make well-informed decisions, while ensuring we remain relevant to the people whose rights we are fighting for.”

Patrick says: “I am immensely proud of what the firm has achieved since I set it up with Henry Hodge and Peter Jones in 1977. It has been incredible to be part of creating legal history with many groundbreaking cases which have helped people to overcome adversity.  We have attracted amazing lawyers to the firm and trained many more.

“As senior partner, I will continue to play a key role in the business and its future strategy. I am confident that with Vidisha the firm has a great leader with the drive and determination to take it forward and continue the fight for justice for our clients by using the law to improve their lives.”

Issue: 7728 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll