header-logo header-logo

03 December 2015
Issue: 7679 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Victory for unpaid carers

The government acted unlawfully when failed to exempt unpaid carers for disabled family members from the benefits cap, the High Court has held.

In Hurley v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2015] EWHC 3382 (Admin), the court found that the secretary of state unjustifiably indirectly discriminated against unpaid carers, breaching their Art 14 rights under the European Convention on Human Rights by not considering the impact on disabled people.

To qualify for carer’s allowance, carers must provide upwards of 35 hours a week care to a severely disabled person who receives disability living allowance. The cared for person was given an exemption from the cap but the carer wasn’t. One of the claimants in the case became homeless as a result.

Rebekah Carrier, solicitor at Hopkin Murray Beskine, who acted for the claimants, says: “If [the claimants] are forced into stopping their important work as carers, the state will have to pick up the tab and arrange alternative care.”

Issue: 7679 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll