header-logo header-logo

Vicarious liability

04 November 2010
Issue: 7440 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Various claimants v Catholic Child Welfare Society and others [2010] EWCA Civ 1106, [2010] All ER (D) 241 (Oct)

Settled authority established that the test to be applied in ascertaining whether an employer was liable for the acts of his employee was: (i) whether the employer had entrusted to the employee the performance of a task which it, the employer, had undertaken; and (ii) if so, whether there was a sufficiently close connection between the torts and the employee’s employment for it to be fair and just to hold the employer vicariously liable.

 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll