header-logo header-logo

Vetting system review

The head of the independent safeguarding authority is to clarify proposals announced last week for a vetting system for those working with children.

The head of the independent safeguarding authority is to clarify proposals announced last week for a vetting system for those working with children.

Speaking on the BBC Today programme, Sir Roger Singleton said that the system is necessary for the protection of children but agreed that some of the concerns raised over the system were valid.

“It’s quite reasonable for any parent to expect that if their school offers to provide transport… those people have been vetted to the point where there is no known reason why they should not work with children,” he said.

Sir Roger said he was surprised that some of the “legitimate concerns” raised over the scheme had not been voiced previously. Proposals for the scheme had first been set out three years ago in legislation. The introduction of the vetting system follows the recommendations set out in the Bichard inquiry following the Soham murders in 2002.

The NSPCC expressed support for the government’s plans, saying that the current criminal records checks were insufficient as they only revealed those people that had offended previously. The charity did however call on the government to clarify its approach.

“This new scheme must be introduced carefully, in a way that does not inadvertently penalise children, weaken community relationships, or provide parents with a false sense of security. The government must now provide clearer and more detailed information about the scheme and how it will work in practice,” the charity said.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll