header-logo header-logo

A very British coup

12 June 2008 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7325 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Effective policing, not repressive legislation, has saved the country in the past, says Geoffrey Bindman

The response of our current government to terrorism is nothing new. But history shows that repressive legislation is not always the answer.

When revolution erupted across the Channel in 1789 fear gripped our rulers. Rumours of armed insurrection were rife and government spies added to the panic with exaggerated reports of secret training camps and the illicit manufacture of weapons. Prominent advocates of democratic reforms were arrested and put on trial for treason. When juries refused to convict new laws were introduced to restrict public meetings and publications critical of the government. After the Napoleonic wars there was more unrest. Many who stayed at home had profited from the war but the returning soldiers had no work and radical ideas again took hold.

The Six Acts

In 1819, the government introduced harsh new laws, the “Six Acts”, which prohibited possession of weapons by civilians, introduced wide search and seizure powers, restricted public meetings, increased penalties

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
back-to-top-scroll