header-logo header-logo

The vanishing exception

27 November 2008 / Victor Joffe KC , James Mather
Issue: 7347 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Part one: How rare are exceptions to the no reflective loss principle? ask Victor Joffe QC & James Mather

Reflective loss is the name given to the loss suffered by a shareholder where there is both breach of a duty owed to the company, and breach of a duty owed to the shareholder, but the shareholder’s loss would be made good if the company enforced its rights against the wrongdoer in respect of its loss (see: eg Johnson v Gore Wood [2002] 2 AC 1, Gardner v Parker [2004] 2 BCLC 554). Prime examples of reflective loss are diminution in value of the claimant’s shares, or loss of dividends on shares, but the term extends to “all other payments which the shareholder might have obtained from the company if it had not been deprived of its funds” (see: Johnson v Gore-Wood at [66]). The no reflective loss principle applies to claims brought by a shareholder not only in his capacity as such, but also to claims brought by him as employee or

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll