header-logo header-logo

14 March 2013
Issue: 7552 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Value of human rights

Rise in use of human rights legislation in commercial disputes

Businesses are increasingly using human rights legislation to win commercial disputes.

The number of reported cases where businesses used the Human Rights Act to bolster their argument rose by 15% last year, from 39 cases in 2011 to 45 cases in 2012, according to figures provided by Sweet & Maxwell.

In one, private providers of residential care services argued local authority cuts to fees prevented them from protecting residents’ right to dignity. In another, film production companies took a mobile phone provider to court to force it to disclose details of customers accused of illegal file-sharing, as this breached their right to property.

Since 2009, the use of the Act in commercial litigation has more than doubled. The Act is also often cited in tax cases brought against HMRC.

Tom Hickman, barrister at Blackstone Chambers, says the Act could be used as an important procedural tool in a case, as well as to protect against interference with company property. “For example, the right to a fair trial can reinforce a business’ request to have a regulatory decision re-examined and influence the way a case is conducted,” he said.

“The right to a fair trial is also generating a lot of litigation around the relationship between commercial proceedings in this country and fair trial rights abroad.”

Issue: 7552 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll