header-logo header-logo

Valuable tactics

25 February 2010 / Steven Lynch
Issue: 7406 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Steven Lynch traces trends in personal injury disposal hearings

A defendant who fails to file an “acknowledgment of service” in response to a claim may have a default judgment entered against him. In such cases, and where liability of personal injury (PI) is not in dispute, costs of a defence are reduced and time in completing necessary quantum allocation questionnaires is saved.

Further, the court is given the opportunity to exercise its case management powers earlier as a “disposal” hearing will usually be listed within six to eight weeks from the date judgment was entered.

According to the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR), in PI claims the default judgment is “for an amount to be decided by the court and costs”.  Paragraph 12.4 of Practice Direction [PD] 26 states:
l The disposal hearing will not last longer than 30 minutes.
l Oral evidence is not usually heard.
l The court can either assess damages or give directions as to the future conduct of the proceedings.
l Evidence at a disposal hearing is by witness statement and statement of cases/application notices provided those

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Chester office

Slater Heelis—Chester office

North West presence strengthened with Chester office launch

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Firm grows commercial disputes expertise with partner promotion

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

NEWS
The House of Lords has set up a select committee to examine assisted dying, which will delay the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
back-to-top-scroll